 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Thursday,
March 17th, 2005 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
In
this issue:
|
|
 |
 |
Editor's
Note
Register Now! Exclusive Seminar
Scheduled
Special
Report
Contributions
To Higher Education Up 3.4 Percent
Fundraising
Tips
1. Online - Easy ways to improve email
response
2. Capital Campaigns - Be
careful with the annual gift
3. Multi-Channel - Integrating
all of your fundraising
Click
here for all NPTimes Newsletters
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Editor's
Note
Register Now! Exclusive Seminar Scheduled
The
NonProfit Times and
The DMA NonProfit Federation will present a half-day seminar
by direct response
copy writing legend Herschell Gordon Lewis that he's calling
"Words As Weapons:
Motivating Or Losing Donors."
The
session will be June 10 at the Nonprofit Federation's offices in
Washington, D.C. Here's the kicker -- Seating is limited to
the first
45 paid registrants. It's a personalized session.
Herschell's syllabus includes:
- Commonly used no-octane words
- Why donors disappear
- Why "We need help" is
obsolete
- The pros and cons of "freemiums"
- How to maximize the power of donor-recognition
- How to get email appeals to work
- Quick hands-on practice
- Questions and arguments
The costs
is $299 for Nonprofit Federation members and $350 for
non-members.
(You'd have to pay him thousands of dollars if he wrote the
copy for
you!)
To
sign-up, call (973) 394-1800 or email to me at ednchief@nptimes.com
Paul
Clolery
Vice President/Editorial Director
|
|
 |
 |
Contributions
To Higher Education Up 3.4 Percent
Contributions to colleges
and universities in the United States increased by 3.4
percent during 2004,
buoyed by a spike in gifts made by individuals, according to
an annual survey
by the Council for Aid to Education (CAE) at the RAND
Corporation.
Nearly
half of the $24.4
billion raised in 2004 was from individuals, a 9.7 percent
increase compared
to 2003. Though alumni giving is the traditional base of
higher education
giving, representing between a quarter to almost a third of
all voluntary
support, alumni giving only grew by 2 percent in 2004.
Individuals other
than alumni drove personal giving up.
(Click
here for full report)
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Fundraising
Tips 1.
Online
- Easy ways to improve email response
In the
direct mail business, sometimes as many as
90 percent of
prospective donors didn't even open the
envelopes. Yet, very
little time and effort was put into testing
outer envelopes.
The same is true with email.
According
to Rick Christ, president of npadvisors.com
in Warrenton,
Va., and a contributing editor of The
NonProfit Times,
many of your emails aren't being opened.
With email there
are four possible reasons:
1.
It isn't being
delivered: It's vital that
you make every possible attempt
to keep email addresses
accurate and current. When
emails from past donors
bounce, you need to reach out to
them via postal mail
and ask them for an updated
address. Gift receipts
are a great, low-risk way to ask
for email addresses.
2.
It's ending up in their spam
folder : Don't
be too cute with your content or
subject line. Your
donors are using
ever-more-devious ways to cull spam
from their inbox. Test your
letters with a group of
insiders to make sure each issue
is being delivered
before you send it to the whole
list.
3.
Your subject line is vague,
too-cute, or suspicious: Again,
don't be too clever. The key
word or words of your
issues (animal safety, kidney
research, etc.) should
probably be in the subject line
of every email.
4.
Your "from" address is
suspicious or unknown: Christ
explained that he used to get
emails from the "Legislative
Information" office of a
nonprofit. Unfortunately the "from" address
was just "LegInfo" and it looked
like junk. Why not
use a short form of your
organization's name, like "Kidney
Assoc." as the from address?
Better yet, test two different "from" addresses
and see which one produces the
better results.
You can
contact Rick Christ at rick@npadvisors.com
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
2.
Capital Campaigns - Be careful with the
annual gift
If your
organization is in the midst of a capital
campaign, encouraging
donors to move their annual gifts to the
building initiative
can be tempting. But assess the move
carefully before encouraging
it, according to Matthew Beem, CFRE,
president of Hartsook
Essential in Independence, Mo.
Consider
the following, Beem said:
A donor
has given $2,500 a year to your organization
for more than
a decade, so it's no surprise she's stirred
by the vision
of even greater community impact shared at
your campaign-awareness
meeting. She calls and tells you she will
pledge the $12,500
necessary to name a room in your new
building after a loved
one. But there's a catch: The only way she
can make the gift
is to convert her $2,500 annual gift into a
capital-campaign
pledge payment for each of the next five
years.
On the
surface, such a move is tempting. The gift
is easy to secure
and boosts your campaign total.
Beneath
that attraction, however, lie at least two
risks, Beem said.
Most obvious is the danger of being unable
to replace her
annual support with other philanthropic
dollars. Beyond the
immediate need to replace annual support is
the risk of losing
the donor after the capital pledge is
fulfilled.
Encouraging
donors to completely stop their annual
support in favor of
a multi-year capital campaign pledge sends a
dangerous message:
Building support, which has a finite
priority, is more important
that annual support, which is infinitely
critical. Sending
such signals could lead donors to conclude
your need for
their support ends with the fulfillment of
their capital
campaign pledge.
There
are ways to avoid the risk of donors trading
annual fund
gifts for capital campaign commitments, Beem
said:
- Conduct
an integrated campaign by including
operating dollars
in your campaign total.
- Solicit
an integrated gift, such as one that
includes a multi-year
annual-fund pledge and a
capital-campaign pledge, or
an outright capital-campaign gift and a
deferred gift commitment.
The key is to meet the donor where they
currently give
and seek to expand the size and scope of
their philanthropy.
- Encourage
the donor to consider a longer pledge
payment period,
keeping the total annual contribution
constant and retaining
a portion of it for annual support.
- Demonstrate
the organization's current and increased
future need
for operating dollars.
- Introduce
a cumulative giving recognition society
that honors donors
for their total support of your
organization and encourages
them to stretch their giving beyond the
capital campaign.
- Communicate
frequently and in every medium how
important annual support
is to your organization's present and
future.
You can
contact Matthew Beem, CFRE, president,
Hartsook Essential
at matt@hartsookcompanies.com
|
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
3. Multi-Channel -
Integrating all of your fundraising
Each message
your nonprofit sends to potential donors
needs to explain
the good work your organization is doing,
why the donor should
help sponsor your work, and how the donor
should take the
next step to volunteer or send a
contribution.
According
to Joel Zimmerman, Ph.D., director of
Consulting Services
Creative
Direct Response, Crofton, Md., if you use
more than one medium
to communicate, the messages will either
reinforce each other
and increase the success of your campaign,
or they will fail
to reinforce each other and thereby diminish
the effects
of all.
Think of
the many ways your potential donors hear
about your organization:
signs on walls, advertisements, printed
brochures, mailed
appeals, telephone calls, newsletter
articles, word of mouth
from Board and staff. "Integrated
fundraising" means your
nonprofit weaves together its various
fundraising strategies,
messages, and campaigns so they all
reinforce each other.
According
to Zimmerman, repetition is a powerful
marketing tool that
motivates a hesitant donor to make a
contribution; but when
successive messages confuse a potential
donor, or present
him with additional choices to ponder, then
multiple asks
may actually decrease the chances of getting
him to donate.
Integrated
fundraising is particularly difficult when
multiple people
on your staff release messages. You might
represent different
activities within the nonprofit but you are
all on the same
team, so make sure your messages work
together effectively.
Even if they are for different programs,
messages can reinforce
each other by using the same logo, the same
byline, and a
consistent theme for all of your
organization's appeals.
To avoid
clashes, keep your staff working
harmoniously and keep communications
active.
Use cross-team
reviews not only to improve messages, but to
keep people
up-to-date on what your nonprofit is sending
out to the public.
Circulate samples of all your fundraising
materials to your
staff, volunteers, and Board members so they
know, and stay
consistent with, the key ideas and themes
you are promoting,
according to Zimmerman.
Many nonprofits
are competing these days for charitable
dollars. By integrating
your various fundraising efforts you can at
least be sure
you are not competing with yourself.
|
|
|
Copyright ©
2005 The
NonProfit Times. |
|
 |
|
|