FEATURE: HEROIN MORE EFFECTIVE THAN METHADONE FOR SOME
ADDICTS, NAOMI STUDY REPORTS
A research
report from the North American Opiate Maintenance Initiative
(NAOMI) published this week in the New England Journal of
Medicine finds that heroin is more effective than methadone for
some hard-core addicts, but also that Dilaudid may work just as
well. The report should only add to rising pressure to expand
opiate maintenance programs in the US.
FEATURE: SEATTLE HEMPFEST BIGGER THAN EVER IN 2009,
BUT GAINING CRITICS
Last
weekend's Seattle Hempfest is likely to have been the biggest
one yet, as multitudes swarmed the waterfront for the two-day
bash. But there are critics aiming at it, including a leading
drug reformer and a former Hempfest organizer.
BOOK OFFER: THIS IS YOUR COUNTRY ON
DRUGS
As part of
our summer fundraising drive, DRCNet is pleased to offer Ryan
Grim's exciting new book, "This Is Your Country on Drugs: The
Secret History of Getting High in America," as our latest
membership premium. Things are happening, and the importance of
your support at this time could not be greater.
LATIN AMERICA: MEXICAN DECRIMINALIZATION BILL NOW LAW
OF THE LAND
A bill that
decriminalizes the possession of small amounts of drug for
personal use is now the law of the land in Mexico. Although
there was some doubt President Calderon would approve it, it
appeared in the official gazette Thursday. It also includes
provisions to allow the state and localities to go after
small-time drug dealers, a power previously reserved to the
federal government.
LATIN AMERICA: MEXICAN DRUG WAR
UPDATE
There seems
to be no end in sight to prohibition-related violence in Mexico.
In fact, it just keeps getting worse.
MEDICAL MARIJUANA: IOWA PUBLIC HEARINGS GET
UNDERWAY
Largely
impelled by tireless medical marijuana advocate Carl Olsen, the
Iowa Pharmacy Board Wednesday held the first in a series of
public hearings about possibly rescheduling marijuana so it
could be used as a medicine under state law.
FEEDBACK: DO YOU READ DRUG WAR
CHRONICLE?
Do you read
Drug War Chronicle? If so, we need your feedback to evaluate our
work and make the case for Drug War Chronicle to funders. We
need donations too.
In a report that was actually completed last
October but not published until this week in the New England
Journal of Medicine, researchers from the North American Opiate
Medication Initiative (NAOMI) found that giving heroin under
supervision to some hard-core drug addicts was more effective
than giving them methadone. The study's publication in the
prestigious peer-reviewed journal is already leading to calls
for experiments with heroin maintenance in the US. To qualify
for the study, participants had to have been addicted to heroin,
Dilaudid, or another opiate for at least five years, have been
injecting for at least the past year, have tried addiction
treatment, including methadone maintenance, at least twice, and
be at least 25 years of age. While researchers were loathe to
generalize their findings, they described heroin maintenance as
"a safe and effective treatment" for chronic addicts who have
not taken to other forms of treatment.
Hastings St.,
downtown Vancouver (from
vandu.org)
In the NAOMI project, researchers monitored 251 heroin
addicts in Vancouver and Montreal and provided them with
maintenance drugs for a year under the supervision of nurses,
doctors, social workers, and psychiatrists. One hundred fifteen
received pharmaceutical heroin (diacetylmorphine), 111 received
methadone, and 25 received Dilaudid (hydromorphone).
Among participants who received heroin by injection, 88%
completed the program compared to 54% of those receiving oral
methadone. Similarly, illicit drug use rates dropped by 67%
among those receiving heroin, compared to 48% among those
receiving methadone.
"Our data show remarkable retention rates and significant
improvements in illicit heroin use, illegal activity and health
for participants receiving injection assisted therapy, as well
as those assigned to optimized methadone maintenance," said Dr.
Martin Schechter, principal investigator for the Center for
Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences at the University of
British Columbia School of Population and Public Health and
NAOMI's lead researcher. "Prior to NAOMI, all of the study
participants had not benefited from repeated standard addiction
treatments. Society had basically written them off as impossible
to treat," he said.
"We now have evidence to show that heroin-assisted therapy is
a safe and effective treatment for people with chronic heroin
addiction who have not benefited from previous treatments. A
combination of optimal therapies -- as delivered in the NAOMI
clinics -- can attract those most severely addicted to heroin,
keep them in treatment and more importantly, help to improve
their social and medical conditions," explained Schechter.
The NAOMI research results mirror similar findings from a
number of European countries, a fact noted in a Journal
editorial by Virginia Berridge. "The results of this trial may
be added to those from Germany, the Netherlands, Spain and
Switzerland," Berridge wrote. "Switzerland has 10 years of
experience in the prescription of heroin, and in a November 2008
referendum, 68% of voters were in favor of its continued
prescription."
The NAOMI findings, along with earlier work from Europe, are
relevant to the United States. According to government figures,
nearly 700,000 Americans are heroin users, and 15% to 25% of
them are heavy users who could benefit from prescription
heroin.
But heroin is a Schedule I drug under the US Controlled
Substances Act, which means it cannot legally be prescribed.
That is unlikely to change anytime soon. Even allowing for a
pilot program would require political decisions that are
unlikely to be made in the foreseeable future.
That needs to change, said advocates of evidence-based drug
policies. "The NAOMI results are clear that prescription heroin
reduces crime, and overdose deaths," said Laura Thomas, deputy
state director of the Drug Policy Alliance. "The reason this
effective treatment isn't available in the United States right
now is politics. The science is there."
"The success of NAOMI, combined with similar results in other
countries, leaves little question that heroin prescription would
reduce crime, and overdose fatalities in the United States as
well," added DPA executive director Ethan Nadelmann. "Recent
votes in Germany and Switzerland, combined with similar evidence
of public support in other countries, show that the public will
support even controversial drug policies when they have proven
results. There is no question that heroin prescription programs
are needed and long overdue in this country. All that stands in
the way is ideology and the backward assumption that it can
never happen in the United States."
It wasn't just DPA wondering about more effective forms of
drug treatment. In a blog post titled Prescription Heroin?, New York Times science
columnist John Tierney asked just that: Is it time for
prescription heroin in the US? He didn't provide an answer, but
the fact that the question is being asked by someone like
Tierney is suggestive.
And if not prescription heroin, what about Dilaudid? It is
Schedule II and can be prescribed, although not, under current
law, for maintenance purposes. Schecter and his fellow
researchers found that NAOMI participants could not distinguish
it from heroin and that it appeared to be equally effective.
2. Drug War Chronicle Book Review:
"Marijuana Is Safer -- So Why Are Driving People to Drink?" by
Paul Armentano, Steve Fox, and Mason Tvert (2009, Chelsea Green
Publishers, 209 pp., $14.95 PB)
In the past few years, Colorado-based
activist Mason Tvert has taken the notion of comparing marijuana
to alcohol and used it to great success, first in organizing
college students around equalizing campus penalties for
marijuana and underage drinking infractions (marijuana offenses
are typically punished more severely), then in running a
successful legalization initiative in Denver in 2005. Tvert and
his organization, SAFER (Safer Alternatives for Enjoyable
Recreation), continue to hammer away at marijuana prohibition,
and now, in collaboration with NORML analyst Paul Armentano and
MPP director for state campaigns Steve Fox, he has taken his
"marijuana is safer" campaign to a new level -- and, hopefully,
to a new and broader audience.
Having known (and repeatedly interviewed) all three coauthors
in the course of my duties for the Drug War Chronicle, I assumed
"Marijuana Is Safer" would be a good book. I was mistaken. It's
a great book, and an extremely useful one. "Marijuana Is Safer"
starts out hitting on all eight cylinders with a foreword from
former Seattle police chief Norm Stamper and never lets up. It
hits its points concisely and engagingly, it is thoroughly
researched, and its political arguments are carefully thought
out.
Regular readers of the Chronicle may not expect to learn a
lot that they didn't know already, but they will likely be
surprised, especially when it comes to the deleterious effects
of alcohol. Did you know about the nasty effects of
acetaldehyde? I didn't. It's what you get when you metabolize
ethanol (alcohol), and it's carcinogenic and damages internal
organs. Because it is so damaging, the body breaks it down into
acetate, but if you're drinking at the rate of more than a drink
an hour, you're body starts lagging behind. Something to keep in
mind the next time someone invites you to join a drinking
contest.
Similarly, you may share the general conviction that alcohol
use can lead to violence, disease, crime, and accidents, but
"Marijuana Is Safer" offers up the hard numbers -- complete with
footnotes. Here's just one hard number: 35,000. That's the
number of deaths each year attributed to chronic alcohol
consumption. We all know what the number of deaths attributed to
chronic use of the chronic is, don't we? That's right, zero.
Armentano, Fox and Tvert offer a mix of history, science,
medicine, media critique, and just plain straight talk as they
survey the history of alcohol and marijuana use in America,
discuss the differing attitudes toward the two drugs, explain
the rise of marijuana prohibition, and, most centrally, compare
and contrast the effects of the two drugs on individual
consumers and society as a whole.
They also dissect the arguments that legalizers have used --
so far, unsuccessfully -- to try to end marijuana prohibition.
While those arguments are perfectly valid, the coauthors argue
that they cannot counter the objection of people who might
otherwise be persuaded: Why should we legalize another vice?
Naturally enough, Armentano, Fox and Tvert have the answer:
"We would not be adding a vice; we would be allowing adults the
option to choose a less harmful alternative for relaxation and
recreation," they write.
They also provide the "money quotes" for several other
skeptical responses to a legalization pitch, all designed to
highlight the comparison of alcohol and marijuana. And these
three are extremely well-positioned to know what to say; all
three have been engaging in this conversation for years.
The coauthors also make a compelling argument that the
"marijuana is safer" approach is a winner precisely because it
forces listeners to think about alcohol and what it does --
something that all Americans know quite a bit about even if they
don't drink. The comparison of marijuana and alcohol brings the
discussion down from lofty abstractions about freedom and
liberty to real world experiences with America's most popular
drugs.
The "marijuana is safer" approach works just fine for
marijuana, but potentially subverts broader anti-prohibitionist
politics. It is difficult to imagine an argument for drug
legalization based on "methamphetamine is safer" or "heroin is
safer." It also effectively throws up a wall between "soft"
marijuana and "hard" other drugs, abandoning broader drug
legalization for freeing the weed alone. But perhaps
"abandoning" is the wrong word. After all, Armentano and Fox
work for marijuana reform organizations -- not drug reform
organizations -- and Tvert's work all along has been about
marijuana.
But possible unhelpful side-effects for broader
anti-prohibitionism aside, "Marijuana Is Safer" is extremely
worthwhile. This is a book you can hand to your mother or your
teacher or your preacher and provide him or her with a nice
framework for looking at marijuana -- one that by its inexorable
comparative logic leads to the inescapable conclusion that
marijuana should be legalized.
And for those readers with an interest in activism, this book
needs to be on your bookshelf. It's full of handy,
well-documented facts, it's got the answers to the questions
you're likely to hear, and it's even got a how-to activism
section at the back. I guarantee that if you own this book, it's
going to be very well-thumbed before very long.
Somewhere around 300,000 people converged
on the Seattle waterfront Saturday and Sunday to attend the 19th
annual Seattle Hempfest, the world's largest marijuana
"protestival," as organizers like to call it. While organizers
and drug reform advocates were out in force to encourage
attendees to get involved in changing the marijuana laws, for
most of the crowd, Hempfest was one big pot party. And that has
some movement critics unhappy.
Hempfest
crowd
Last year's attendance was estimated at 310,000. While
figures are not yet in for last weekend's event, given the huge
crowds, it is likely this year's figure will be even higher.
With hundreds of vendors selling glass pipes, bongs,
tie-dyes, and assorted other pot-related paraphernalia, as well
as dozens of food vendors, with seven stages alternating musical
acts with activist speakers, and with crowds so thick that
people literally could not move at some points by mid-afternoon
on both days, Hempfest seems more like a dense urban community
than a festival. And like any urban community, Hempfest had a
police presence, but as far as can be determined, police
couldn't find anyone to arrest despite the ever-present scent of
marijuana smoke in the air.
That's in part because Seattleites voted in 2003 to make
adult marijuana offenses the lowest law enforcement priority.
But it is also in part because, unlike some other police forces,
the Seattle police actually acknowledge and heed the will of the
voters. In all of last year, Seattle police arrested only 133
people for marijuana possession -- and those were all people who
had already been detained on other charges.
It is that tolerant attitude toward marijuana that makes the
massive law-breaking at Hempfest possible. In almost any other
city in the US, such brazen defiance of the drug laws would
almost certainly result in mass arrests. Even this weekend's
Boston Freedom Rally, the second largest pro-marijuana event in
the country, will see numerous arrests -- if police behavior in
the past is any indicator.
Hempfest-targeted sky ad, pulled by
helicopter
Drug reform organizations including NORML, Students for Sensible
Drug Policy and StoptheDrugWar.org (publisher of this
newsletter) were present with booths or tables, as were numerous
medical marijuana support groups. But those booths and tables
had to compete with bong-sellers and pipe-makers, t-shirt
vendors and hippie couture outlets, and the hundreds of other
vendors cashing in on the crowds.
To really get the drug reform message out, Hempfest
organizers and reform activists took to the various stages
between acts to exhort audiences to make Hempfest a party with a
purpose. Among the nationally known activists speechifying at
Hempfest were "Radical Russ" Belville of NORML, Sandee Burbank
of Mothers Against Misuse and Abuse, Mike and Valerie Corral of
the Wo/Men's Alliance for Medical Marijuana (WAMM), Debbie
Goldsberry of the Berkeley Patients Group, Washington state
legislator and head of the Voluntary Committee of Lawyers Roger
Goodman, Marijuana Policy Project head Rob Kampia, medical
marijuana specialist Dr. Frank Lucido, former medical marijuana
prisoner Todd McCormick, cannabis scientist Dr. Robert Melamede,
and NORML founder Keith Stroup and current executive director
Allen St. Pierre. For a complete list of speakers, go here.
Activists also educated those interested in learning more
about marijuana law reform and related topics at the Hemposium
tent, which featured panels on "Human Rights for Cannabis
Farmers, Dispensers and Consumers," "Global Hempenomics,"
"Cannabliss: An Entheogen for the Ages," "Cannabis and the
Culture Wars: The Coming Truce," and "Cannabis Coverage: Reefer
Sanity for the 21st Century." For a complete list of Hemposium
panels, click here.
While Hempfest came off without any serious problems, it has
sparked a couple of related controversies. This week, Criminal Justice
Policy Foundation head Eric Sterling wrote a blog post, Hempfest is Huge, But is It Good Politics?,
in which he answered his own question with a resounding "no."
Hempfest and similar rallies are "a political fraud," he wrote.
Even worse, they are "advertisements for irresponsible drug
use."
''Hemposium,''
with speakers (l-r): Reason's David Nott, SAFER's Mason Tvert,
journalist Fred Gardner and Chronicle editor Phil
Smith
Similarly, former Hempfest organizer Dominic Holden stirred
the pot the week before Hempfest with an article in the Seattle
Stranger, A Few Words About Hempfest, in which he
complained it was a "patchouli-scented ghetto" and overly
countercultural. Like Sterling, Holden saw the hippiesque
trappings of Hempfest as counterproductive. "Countercultural
celebrations and drug legalization advocacy are mutually
undermining ambitions," he wrote.
Hempfest organizers were not amused, and on Sunday, Holden
was removed from the back of the Main Stage by unhappy erstwhile
comrades. They explained why in an interview with Steve Bloom's Celebstoner, and
Holden continued the spat with his own interview.
Perhaps the organizers of Hempfest and similar events will
listen to Sterling and Holden, but probably not. Hempfest is a
celebration of the pot-smoking counterculture, and it's not
likely to go away or change its ways because a guy in a suit and
a disaffected former friend are unhappy with how it operates.
Straight-laced drug reformers will most likely just have to put
up with Hempfest and its pot-happy ilk. They can treat it like
the crazy aunt in the attic, but they can't get rid of it.
The Reform Conference, sponsored by our friends at the Drug Policy
Alliance, is the major biennial gathering of drug policy
reformers of all kinds. The last one, held in New Orleans in
2007, brought together over 1,000 attendees representing 25
different countries. This year attendees will have the
opportunity to spend three days interacting with people
committed to finding alternatives to the war on drugs while
participating in sessions given by leading experts from around
the world. Click here to register -- early bird rates
are available through October 9, and discounts are available for
students and New Mexico residents.
Some testimonials from the 2007 conference:
"The conference was a tremendous educational
experience. I established tons of contacts and look forward to a
future dedicated to fighting the drug war."
"Lots of great energy! This was my very first conference and
I would most definitely recommend it to any health care
professional desiring information on this subject. The speakers
were very educated on their subjects and readily available to
answer questions."
"This conference has been an incredible experience. The level
of knowledge and experience from the presenters has been
fantastic."
"I thought the conference was a wonderful collaboration of
minds and knowledge on the multiple aspects of drug policy. I
enjoyed having applicable speakers on both sides of the debate
of policy and drug reform."
"This conference exceeded my expectations in every way
possible. As a first year attendee I had no idea what I would
learn."
"Once again, thank you for the most exciting and informative
conference in the world."
From the antebellum temperance movement, to the unintended
consequences of Nixonian and Reaganite anti-drug efforts, to the
hard-to-explain '00s LSD shortage, "This is Your Country on
Drugs" is an entertaining, enlightening, and accessible account
of America's love-hate relationship with psychoactive substances
ranging from the nation's beginnings to the present day.
We continue to offer our exciting new t-shirts that make the
point about prohibition and the drug war. For a contribution
of $36, you can choose either of our new StoptheDrugWar.org
T-shirts pictured to the right ? "Prohibition Doesn't Work" or
"STOP" (click on images for an enlarged view). For a gift of $60
or more, you can receive both t-shirts. For a contribution of
$90 or more, you can receive both shirts and Ryan Grim's book as
our thanks, or substitute any item from the
StoptheDrugWar.org inventory.
Your membership today will make an immediate
impact by helping StoptheDrugWar.org
(DRCNet):
Grow the groundswell for change by helping grassroots
organizations ? our movement's "boots on the ground" ? reach out
to more people.
Pressure the Obama Administration to make good on all
of its promises and lobby Congress to make smart funding
choices by providing the truth about the Drug War.
Break more records!
With each improvement to our web site, we become an even more
powerful resource for anyone (including media and politicians)
to find information about the Drug War.
What you and I and our friends are doing together is
working. We can't back off now. By taking advantage of
the opportunity we have during this pro-reform climate, we can
change minds, change laws and, most importantly, change good
people's lives.
Thank you very much,
David Borden Executive Director,
StoptheDrugWar.org (DRCNet)
A bill that decriminalizes the possession
of small amounts of drugs for personal use in Mexico is now the
law of the land, although it will not go into effect for one
year to give states time to adjust their laws. It was published
Thursday in the Official Daily of the Federation, the Mexican
equivalent of the Federal Register. (To read the complete text
of the bill in Spanish, go to page 83 of the Official Daily.
According to the new law, the amounts of various drugs
decriminalized for personal use are:
opium -- 2 grams
cocaine -- 1/2 gram
heroin -- 1/10 gram
marijuana -- 5 grams
LSD -- 150 micrograms
methamphetamine -- 1/5 gram
ecstasy -- 1/5 gram
''Global
Marijuana Day'' demonstration in Mexico City, May
2008
The decriminalization measure is part of a broader bill aimed
at reducing "narcomenudeo," or retail drug sales. The bill would
allow states and localities to prosecute small-time drug dealing
offenses, a power that currently resides only with the federal
government. It also allows police to make drug buys to build
cases, a break with precedent in Mexico.
Whether the overall bill is a step forward or a step back is
open to debate. Read our earlier discussion of the bill here.
Mexican drug trafficking organizations make billions each
year trafficking illegal drugs into the United States, profiting
enormously from the prohibitionist drug policies of the US
government. Since Mexican president Felipe Calderon took office
in December 2006 and called the armed forces into the fight
against the so-called cartels, prohibition-related violence has
killed over 12,000 people, with a death toll of over 4,000 so
far in 2009. The increasing militarization of the drug war and
the arrest of several high- profile drug traffickers have failed
to stem the flow of drugs -- or the violence -- whatsoever. The
Merida initiative, which provides $1.4 billion over three years
for the US to assist the Mexican government with training,
equipment and intelligence, has so far failed to make a
difference. Here are a few of the latest developments in
Mexico's drug war:
Mexican
anti-drug patrols
Wednesday, August 12:
-Four People , including a serving member of
the US Army and a 16-year old boy, were arrested this week in
the May 15 slaying of a Juarez cartel lieutenant and government
informant. The men were apparently paid some $10,000 dollars to
participate in the assassination of Jose Daniel Gonzalez
Galeana.
Friday, August 14:
-19 people were killed and 20 wounded in a
prison fight in Durango. Many of the victims were killed by
bullets from firearms that had been smuggled into the prison.
Reports indicate that the clash may have been a "dispute for
dominance" among inmates incarcerated on organized crime and
drug trafficking charges.
Saturday, August 15:
-In Monclova, Coahuila, three bodyguards were
killed during an attack on an ex-general who serves as police
chief. Gunmen in pickup trucks attacked Monclova police chief
Juan Carlos Pacheco as he headed home Friday evening. Pacheco
was unharmed in the attack.
-In the state of Mexico (which surrounds most
of Mexico City), federal police apprehended Héctor Manuel
Oyarzabal Hernández, reportedly a high-ranking member of La
Familia. Oyarzabal reportedly handled drug-trafficking in the
cities of Ixtapaluca, Chalco, Valle de Chalco and Ozumba, all of
which are in the greater Mexico City metropolitan area. Seven
other men were arrested alongside him, along with several
automatic weapons, two motorcycles, three SUVs and hundreds of
rounds of ammunition. The Mexican government had increased
operations against La Familia since the July 13 discovery of 12
federal police officers killed by the organization.
-Carlos Ocaranza, a musician who specialized
in narco-corridos (ballads that glorify the
deeds of drug traffickers), was shot dead as he left a concert
in Guadalajara. The attack also killed his manager, who
succumbed to his wounds on Monday. Ocaranza was also known as
"Crazy Elizalde", a reference to his distant relative Valentin
Elizalde, an extremely popular musician who was murdered in
2006.
Sunday, August 16:
-Hundreds of Mexican customs officials working
at airports and border crossings were replaced by the Mexican
government. The operation was aimed at rooting out corrupt
inspectors who facilitate the flow of drugs, arms and money into
and out of Mexico. Reforma reported that 1,100 officers were
ousted, to be replaced by new personnel that had undergone extra
training and background checks. The ousted officers were not
fired. Instead, their contracts were not renewed. This is part
of a larger effort on the part of the Calderon government to
fight corruption in Mexico. In the past, entire police
departments were replaced by military personnel, and politicians
with alleged ties to drug cartels and other organized criminal
networks have been arrested.
Monday, August 17:
- 33 people were killed in drug related
violence across northern Mexico on Sunday and Monday. In Ciudad
Juarez, eight people were killed when gunmen burst into a bar
and shot dead the owner, his wife, and six customers. Two other
males, aged 20 and 25, were killed in the center of Ciudad
Juarez in the afternoon. In the town of Praxedis (36 miles from
Ciudad Juarez), heavily armed gunmen in black uniforms assaulted
a house, killing six. Several other killings were reported in
different parts of Chihuahua, of which Ciudad Juarez is the
capital. Additionally, four people were killed during a two-hour
firefight with police and military elements in the northern
province of Nuevo Leon.
-In the resort town of Cozumel, suspected
cartel assassins killed four men. The bodies, which showed signs
of torture, were found in a car. Cozumel, which is roughly 12
miles from the mainland, has seen very little drug-related
violence in recent years.
Tuesday, August 18:
-A father and his four-year old son were
killed after being attacked by gunmen as they drove on a highway
near Ciudad Juarez. The mother was wounded and taken to the
hospital. Later on Tuesday, several banners appeared in Ciudad
Juarez denying that cartels were responsible for civilian
deaths. In neighboring Coahuila state, gunmen attacked the
offices of the Siglo de Torreon newspaper. Nobody was injured in
the attack.
-American investigators announced on Tuesday
that they believe that the recent wildfire in Santa Barbara,
California was started by marijuana growers with possible
connections to Mexican drug cartels. A cooking device left at
one of the grow-ops was found to be the cause of the flame.
Additionally, 30,000 marijuana plants and an AK-47 rifle were
found near the origin of the blaze in Los Padres National
Forest. US Forest Service Special Agent Russ Arthur said that
although this is the first large wildfire known to have been
caused by marijuana grow-ops, they do cause, on average, three
to four smaller fires in California each year.
Total reported body count for the last week: 219
Total reported body count for the year: 4,432
A quiet week on the corrupt cops front, but
the two stories we do have share a common theme: problems with
snitches. Let's get to it:
In Gaffney, South Carolina, a Cherokee County sheriff's officer was arrested
Tuesday and fired Wednesday for exchanging drugs for sex
with a female confidential informant. Now former Officer Troy
Cooper, 56, is accused of providing marijuana, money, and other
contraband to the informant in return for sexual favors between
March 2008 and last week. Investigators from the State Law
Enforcement Division (SLED) were called in by Sheriff Bill
Blanton. A search warrant in the case indicates that SLED has
recorded telephone conversations between Blanton and the
informant.
In St. Louis, police commanders are at odds with the police
union over departmental demands that up to 20 officers
reveal details about their confidential informants. The
department has acknowledged in court filings that "one or more"
officers "have included false information in affidavits" for
warrants, and says the investigation is aimed at stopping "the
concerns of police abuse and violation of civil rights." At
least two officers, Shell Sharp and William Noonan, have already
resigned, and prosecutors have dropped 39 cases in which one or
the other officer was involved. But the police union has won a
temporary restraining order to block the revealing of informant
information, saying it would endanger snitches and officers.
Whether they can win a permanent injunction will be decided next
week.
House and Senate appropriators have agreed
to ax only 11 of 48 non-military discretionary spending programs
targeted for elimination by the Obama administration, but
funding for the Safe and Drug-Free Schools community grants
program is one of them. That's what Congress Daily determined following an
analysis of fiscal year 2010 budget documents and appropriations
bills.
In May, the Obama administration compiled a budgetary hit list of 121 programs, military
and non-military, that it recommended be cut or eliminated
completely. The $295 million for Safe and Drug-Free Schools
community grants was among those programs recommended for total
elimination. The administration will continue funding the Safe
and Drug-Free Schools National Program.
In recommending termination of the community grants program,
the Obama administration argued that "while reducing violence
and drug use in and around schools is a compelling goal, reviews
by an independent evaluator and by a statutory advisory
committee have demonstrated that this program is poorly matched
to achieving that goal." It cited a 2001 RAND Drug Policy
Research Center study that described the program as "profoundly
flawed" and a 2007 Safe and Drug-Free Schools advisory committee
study that affirmed the RAND findings.
"The program does not focus on the schools most in need and
the thin distribution of funding prevents many local
administrators from designing and implementing meaningful
interventions," the White House said in its budget.
Both the House and Senate Appropriations Committees agreed
with the White House and zeroed out the program. The House
education appropriations bill has already passed, but the Senate
bill is still in process. Proponents of the program may still
try to reinstate it in the Senate or during the conference
committee to reconcile the House and Senate appropriations
bills.
Medical marijuana advocates were out in
force Wednesday in Des Moines as the Iowa Pharmacy Board held
the first in a series of public hearings on whether the
state should reschedule marijuana from Schedule I (no medical
use, high abuse potential) to Schedule II (medical use, high
abuse potential). The board will make recommendations to the
state legislature later this year.
Carl
Olsen
The hearings are part of the board's review of the scientific
evidence around the medicinal use of marijuana, a review that
will also examine state and federal laws. The review comes after
the board last month again rejected a petition from Carl Olsen
of Iowans for Medical Marijuana to remove
marijuana from Schedule I. The board had earlier rejected a
similar petition, but a Polk County (Des Moines) judge in April
ordered the board to reconsider.
Olsen argued that because medical marijuana is legal in 14
states it no longer meets the definition of a Schedule I drug.
The board disagreed, saying that marijuana would have to be
legal in all 50 states and under federal law for it to be
rescheduled. But it did agree to review the evidence. The public
hearings are part of that process.
Wednesday's hearing in Des Moines featured poignant testimony
from patients as they pleaded with the board to stop treating
them like criminals for using marijuana to treat pain and other
conditions. "People are suffering who need not suffer. People
are rotting in jail who should not be there," said Kevin Feeley
of Ames in remarks reported by the Des Moines Register. Feeley said he used
marijuana to ease his suffering from spinal cancer.
Feeley joined other speakers in telling the board that
marijuana is safer and less addictive than many prescription
medications. They urged the board to help Iowa join the ranks of
states where patients are allowed to use marijuana with a
doctor's recommendation.
Robert Manke of Des Moines said he used marijuana for pain
relief from injuries caused by traffic accidents and to reduce
nausea from prescription medications. "I know what it's like to
crawl around on the bathroom floor like an animal in the
morning, vomiting with my head in the stool," he said. "I need
your help. I'm not here because I want to get high. I'm here
because I want to stop being sick. And I want to stop being
persecuted."
It wasn't just patients. Several doctors testified in support
of medical marijuana Wednesday, including Dr. Edward Hertko, a
retired physician, who echoed that marijuana is less dangerous
and addictive than many common prescription drugs. It wasn't
about getting high, he said. "The people who want recreational
marijuana already know how to get it," Hertko noted.
Not everyone was on board. Representing the Iowa Elks
Association, Gary Young warned that allowing for medical
marijuana could make it easier for people, including young
people, to get ahold of it. He also challenged the plant's
medical efficacy and argued that prescription drugs are more
pure and easier to control than smoked marijuana. "I urge the
board to make its decision on scientific evidence and not on
anecdotal evidence," he said.
The Governor's Office of Drug Control Policy did not testify
at the hearing, but offered a written statement in opposition.
The office position is that the science so far does not support
using marijuana as a medicine. As its web site notes: "Unless,
or until, the consensus of medical evidence changes, ODCP
opposes any proposal to legalize marijuana smoking for medical
purposes."
The three remaining public hearings are September 2 in Mason
City, October 7 in Iowa City, and November 4 in Council
Bluffs.
Japan's National Police Agency reported
Thursday that marijuana arrests were at an all-time high
during the first six months of this year. Police said 1,446 were
arrested for possessing, using or trafficking in marijuana, up
21.3% from a year earlier. Of those arrested for pot offenses,
63.2% were under the age of 30, suggesting that marijuana use is
spreading among young people.
One hundred four people were arrested for marijuana
cultivation, up 40.5% over the same period last year. Home
cultivation of marijuana is assisted by the availability of
seeds and grow supplies over the Internet and by consumers'
fears of venturing into illicit drug markets.
The 40.5% increase in grow busts in the first half of this
year comes after a 50% increase in grow busts during the first
half of last year.
The record arrest figures come as Japan comes to grip with a
growing marijuana culture. In the past couple of years, the
country has seen repeated "scandals" around marijuana use,
including the expulsion of three Russian wrestlers from sumo
competition for smoking pot, the arrests of various celebrities,
and a national freak-out over students at prestigious
universities smoking pot.
The apparent increase in marijuana use in Japan comes despite
mass media denunciations of it and despite harsh drug laws.
Under the 1948 marijuana control law, any pot offense can earn a
prison term of up to 10 years.
The ruling came Wednesday at the High Court in Kota Baru.
Judge Datuk Muhamad Ideres Muhamad Rapee ordered the sentence
after the prosecution managed to prove a prima facie against
Roseedah Cheubong, 41, who was crying as the sentence was
issued.
The court ignored the pleas of Roseedah's attorney, Zamri Mat
Nawang, who told it she was a single mother trying to fend for
herself and her teenage child and that she was sorry for what
she had done. Instead, it listened to deputy prosecutors Wan
Abad Razak Wan Hussin, who called for the mandated penalty
because of the "gravity" of the offense.
Roseedah has been jailed since she was arrested in February
2004 for selling a kilogram of weed outside a gas station. No
word yet on possible appeals.
The provincial High Court sentence came little more than a
week after the Malaysian Federal Court upheld the death sentence
of a taxi driver for trafficking less than two kilos of
marijuana. According to the anti-death penalty organization Hands Off
Cain, so far this year, Malaysian courts have imposed the
death sentence 12 times. Only two death sentences were for
murder. The other 10 were for drug trafficking, and eight of
those were for trafficking marijuana.
Human rights and harm reduction groups have organized an
international campaign to end the death penalty for drug
offenses. Read about it here.
Since Malaysia does not make a habit of publicly announcing
executions, it is unclear how many of the marijuana traffickers
sentenced to death have actually been executed.
August 23, 1839: The United Kingdom
captured Hong Kong as a base as it prepared for war with Qing
China. The ensuing 3-year conflict was later known as the First
Opium War.
August 25, 2001: The Denver Post reports that US District
Judge John L. Kane, Jr. said: "The best way for a kid who is
caught using or selling drugs to get off is to select a
congressman, senator or high-ranking official as one's parent."
Indeed, after the son of the now-disgraced US Rep. Randy "Duke"
Cunningham (R-CA), was found flying an airplane loaded with 400
pounds of marijuana, he was freed on bail but then tested
positive for cocaine three times. He wound up getting 2 1/2
years in prison -- a long time, but not by the standards of US
criminal justice today. Former Education Secretary Richard
Riley's son got just six months' house arrest for conspiring to
sell cocaine and marijuana, though he had been indicted earlier
on charges that can lead to life in prison.
August 27, 2002: Canadian Press, Canada's national newswire,
reports that Health Minister Anne McLellan said the federal
government is not backing away from its plan to supply patients
with medical marijuana. Bristling earlier reports that the
project had been shelved, McLellan said, "In fact, far from
shelving it, what we're doing is implementing the second
stage."
August 22, 2003: David Borden, Executive Director of
StoptheDrugWar.org, writes an open letter to the Chief Judge of
the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, Rufus G. King
III, stating his refusal to serve jury duty. "... I have
determined that unjust drug laws, and the corrosion wrought by
the drug war on the criminal justice system as a whole, compel
me to conscientiously refuse jury service," says Borden. Visit
http://stopthedrugwar.org/openletter
to read the full letter.
Please send quotes and reports on how you put our flow of
information to work, for use in upcoming grant proposals and
letters to funders or potential funders. Do you use DRCNet as a
source for public speaking? For letters to the editor? Helping
you talk to friends or associates about the issue? Research? For
your own edification? Have you changed your mind about any
aspects of drug policy since subscribing, or inspired you to get
involved in the cause? Do you reprint or repost portions of our
bulletins on other lists or in other newsletters? Do you have
any criticisms or complaints, or suggestions? We want to hear
those too. Please send your response -- one or two sentences
would be fine; more is great, too -- email borden@drcnet.org or reply
to a Chronicle email or use our online comment
form. Please let us know if we may reprint your comments,
and if so, if we may include your name or if you wish to remain
anonymous. IMPORTANT: Even if you have given us this kind of
feedback before, we could use your updated feedback now too --
we need to hear from you!
Again, please help us keep Drug War Chronicle alive at this
important time! Click
here to make a donation online, or send your check or money
order to: DRCNet, P.O. Box 18402, Washington, DC 20036. Make
your check payable to DRCNet Foundation to make a tax-deductible
donation for Drug War Chronicle -- remember if you select one of
our member premium gifts that will reduce the portion of your
donation that is tax-deductible -- or make a non-deductible
donation for our lobbying work -- online or check payable to
Drug Reform Coordination Network, same address. We can also
accept contributions of stock -- email borden@drcnet.org for the
necessary info.
Want to help end the "war on drugs," while
earning college credit too? Apply for a StoptheDrugWar.org
(DRCNet) internship for this summer or fall semester and you
could come join the team and help us fight the fight!
StoptheDrugWar has a strong record of providing substantive
work experience to our interns -- you won't spend the summer
doing filing or running errands, you will play an integral role
in one or more of our exciting programs. Options for work you
can do with us include coalition outreach as part of the
campaign to rein in the use of SWAT teams, to expand our work to
repeal the drug provision of the Higher Education Act to
encompass other bad drug laws like the similar provisions in
welfare and public housing law; blogosphere/web outreach; media
research and outreach; web site work (research, writing,
technical); possibly other areas. If you are chosen for an
internship, we will strive to match your interests and abilities
to whichever area is the best fit for you.
While our internships are unpaid, we will reimburse you for
metro fare, and DRCNet is a fun and rewarding place to work. To
apply, please send your resume to David Guard at dguard@drcnet.org, and feel
free to contact us at (202) 293-8340. We hope to hear from you!
Check out our web site at http://stopthedrugwar.org
to learn more about our organization.
DRCNet needs your support! Donations can be made by
credit card at http://stopthedrugwar.org/donate
or sent by mail to P.O. Box 18402, Washington, DC
20036-8402. Donations to the Drug Reform
Coordination Network are not tax-deductible. Deductible
contributions supporting our educational work can be made by
check to the DRCNet Foundation, a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt
organization, same address.
PERMISSION to reprint or redistribute any or all of
the contents of Drug War Chronicle is hereby granted. We ask
that any use of these materials include proper credit and, where
appropriate, a link to one or more of our web
sites. If your publication customarily pays for
publication, DRCNet requests checks payable to the organization.
If your publication does not pay for materials, you are free to
use the materials gratis. In all cases, we request notification
for our records, including
physical copies where material has appeared in
print. Contact: Drug Reform Coordination Network, P.O. Box
18402, Washington, DC 20036, (202) 293-8340 (voice), (202)
293-8344 (fax), e-mail drcnet@drcnet.org.
Articles of a purely educational nature in Drug War
Chronicle appear courtesy of DRCNet Foundation, unless otherwise
noted.
This message was sent to . Visit your subscription management page to modify your email communication preferences or update your personal profile. To stop receiving Drug War Chronicle (full text version), click to unsubscribe. To stop ALL email from DRCNet, click to remove yourself from our lists (or reply via email with "remove or unsubscribe" in the subject line).